@RZ923 Lol... maybe I should write a description too haha

@Ashila thx that is COOL

@bulba_bulbasaur 🙂

@victorioussheep No problem, it was a very intriguing question! 😄

add a special tag here for typo/ bug hunters

@CoherentMango me too 🙂

For Mac users, you go to Edit on the menu bar and click on it.
Screen Shot 2020-07-14 at 11.21.27 AM.png

Then, go to Emojis & Symbols and click on it.
Screen Shot 2020-07-14 at 11.21.38 AM.png

Then, you can choose which emoji you want.
Screen Shot 2020-07-14 at 11.28.41 AM.png

If you want multiple of the same emojis, highlight the emoji you want to copy and press Command+C. Then, press Command+V as many times as you want of that emoji. You should have multiple emojis now.

F3B84FA1-6BBE-474A-923F-47D4C33CB56C.jpeg

Or if you want to change the sound (I remember someone mentioned it but I couldn’t find where) you can change it in Settings:
1B5670ED-4EEC-47FA-B942-2B745A7BAF60.jpeg

@Da-Parasite
Siri + \( \frac{0}{0}\) = Siri the Bully

@RZ923 lol

@The-Blade-Dancer This is an excellent idea 🙂 I think Daily Challenge has been posting articles and resources on WeChat, but not on other platforms. 🙂

@energizedpanda extraordinary 👏

@TSS-Graviser Yes, it's because the construction of a tangent not perpendicular to the radius is inherently possible, which is why the diagram just looks wrong. 🙂 But when you prove things, you can't just say, "It looks like it..." You instead refer to theorems, facts or properties that are unambiguous. For now it's just very weird, but being able to prove things, while onerous at times, makes it nice for us, because we can put total faith in our assumptions and calculations. 🙂

@debbie: Yeah, that's really true because I once asked him to take a picture with me and he said yes!

@RZ923 Green is my favorite color too!
$$\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot$$
$$\text{GET TO 314}$$
$$\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot$$

Hi @userusername,
It is because your calculator rounds the number \(\overline{0.66666666...}\) to the number \(0.66666667.\)
The same thing happens when you want to round the number \(\overline{0.316495...}\) to its hundredths. Instead of \(0.31\) you will get \(0.32,\) since the next digit after \(1\) is \(6\) that is \(\geq 5,\) so the rounding goes up.

@The-Blade-Dancer Yes it's me. What?

@sqwishy It's not a bother at all! I've just sent you a direct message. 🙂

@The-Blade-Dancer i agree... 😢