There's a lot of ratio talk here. What is the importance of all these ratios?
-
Module 2 Week 3 Day 12 Your Turn Part 2
There's a lot of ratio talk here. What is the importance of all these ratios?
(Timestamp 4:40) I thought subtraction isn't commutative...
-
@TSS-Graviser Hi again!
Ratios are good way of comparing one number with another one.
Let's start with two numbers. The bigger number represents an older sister
and the smaller number represents a little brother
. When mother
makes cookies,
older sister eats \(4\)
cookies but the little brother eats only \(2\) :cookies. How would you compare the amount of food that they each eat?
Would you say that the older sister
eats \(2\) more cookies
than the little brother
?
Should the older sisteralways eat \(2\) more of whatever food there is, compared with her little brother
?
But then what if mother
serves rice
-- should the older sister
have exactly \(1\) more grain of rice compared with the little brother
?
No, that wouldn't make sense! If the older sister
got just \(1\) more grain of rice
compared with the little brother
, then she would be eating almost the same amount of rice as the little brother,
, because the little brother might eat \(1,000\) grains of rice (a cup of cooked rice has about \(3,000\) grains of rice in it. Then the older sister would only get \(1,001\) grains of rice.
What if the little brother
eats \(\frac{1}{2}\) of a hamburger
? Would that mean that the older sister
should eat \(2 + \frac{1}{2} = 2 \frac{1}{2}\) hamburgers?
Or, suppose the little brother
can eat \(\frac{1}{12}\) of a birthday cake
Does that mean that the older sister can eat \(2 \frac{1}{12}\) birthday cakes
?
This is why we use ratios, which describe how big numbers are compared with each other using multiplication and division rather than addition and subtraction.
The correct thing is to say that in order to get the older sister's
serving, you take \(\frac{1}{2}\) of the little brother's
amount and add it to what the little brother
eats. So if the little brother
eats \(1\) bowl of rice
, the older sister eats \(1 + \frac{1}{2}\) bowls of rice
. If the little brother
eats \(\frac{1}{2}\) of a hamburger
, the older sister
eats \(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4} = \frac{3}{4}\) of a hamburger
. If the little brothe
eats \(\frac{1}{12}\) of a birthday cake
, the older sister
eats \(\frac{1}{12} + \frac{1}{24} = \frac{3}{24} = \frac{1}{8}\) of a birthday cake
.
Another way to compare the older sister
and little brother
is to say that the older sister
eats \(1.5\) times as much as the little brother. This is because she eats one-and-a-half of the little brother's
serving.
This is why we use ratios!
We can say that the ratio between the little brother's
serving and the older sisters's
serving is \(1 \text{ to } 1.5,\) or \(1:1.5.\) If you multiply both numbers by \(2,\) you get \(2:3,\) which is the same ratio. As you get more experience with doing math problems, you might prefer using ratios to compare numbers, because it's easier to calculate things.
For your other question, Prof. Loh isn't actually switching around the subtraction (like you might switch around the terms in \(3 + 4 = 4 + 3),\) but he is simplifying
$$ \frac{2 \sqrt{3}}{\sqrt{3} + 2} $$
which is the same thing as
$$ \frac{2 \sqrt{3}}{2 + \sqrt{3} }. $$
He wants to "rationalize the denominator," so he multiplies the whole thing by a fraction equaling \(1\). This fraction is \(\frac{2 - \sqrt{3}}{2 - \sqrt{3}}\).
It's the same thing as what you do when you multiply a fraction by the same thing to the top and bottom in order to get a different denominator:
$$ \frac{2}{7} = \frac{2}{7} \times \frac{3}{3} = \frac{6}{21}$$
The reason he does this is so that we get a nice difference of squares in the denominator, which effectively gets rid of the square root.
$$ (a+b)(a-b) = a^2 - b^2 $$
$$ (2 + \sqrt{3} )(2 - \sqrt{3}) = 2^2 - \sqrt{3}^2 $$
Then, the bottom just becomes
$$ 4 - 3 $$
which equals \(1!\)