Why not the other way around?
-
Prof. Loh says that since we're trying to drain the pool and the filling the pool is working against it, the equation is:
By similar logic, we're trying to fill the pool, and draining the pool is working against it, so the equation is:
Are these two equivalent to each other? Thanks!
-
Really good idea you have there, @aaronhma !
One thing though (soo close!)-- since you're kinda looking at the problem from the perspective of the filling pipe, we actually have to flip the sign of the . Here's why:
Let's look at the first equation:
What this equation literally means is that, in minute, the large pipe drains of the pool, the small pipe drains of the pool, and the filling pipe fills or "un-drains" of the pool, which is why we subtract the . This altogether is equal to draining of the pool.
But looking at the second equation, which is from the perspective of the filling pipe, we have:
This equation says that, in minute, the filling pipe fills of the pool, the small pipe drains or "un-fills" of the pool, which is why we subtract , the large pipe drains or "un-fills" of the pool, which is why we subtract.
But here's the catch: this altogether is equal to draining of the pool. We have "un-filled" the pool by that much. This means we have less water than when we started.
So, the correct equation would be actually equal to :
Notice how this is exactly the same as Prof. Loh's equation but multiplied all the way on both sides by .
Really great thinking you did there, and it really goes to show how many different ways there are to solve the same problem! Well done -
This post is deleted!