Forum — Daily Challenge
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Why can't the height of the new "mail" shape be 3? Since the middle line is already three?

    Module 2 Day 4 Challenge Part 3
    2
    9
    28
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • victorioussheepV
      victorioussheep M0★ M1★ M2★ M3★ M4
      last edited by

      And I kinda need more explanation on how the height is 3/2 square root of 3.....

      audreyA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
      • audreyA
        audrey MOD @victorioussheep
        last edited by

        @victorioussheep To answer your second question, we can figure out the height using the special properties of a 30-60-90 triangle! When you have a triangle with angles 30, 60, and 90 degrees, and you know the length of one of its sides, then you can figure out the lengths of all the other sides (this is why this type of triangle is really useful):
        30-60-90.png

        So in this case, we have a 30-60-90 triangle, and the hypotenuse is given to be 3. So then we know that the other sides have length (3/2) and (3/2)*sqrt(3).

        You definitely don't have to memorize this-- if you understand how the proof for how the lengths are derived (hint: drop an altitude from an equilateral triangle) and use the fact a few times, it becomes pretty intuitive.

        For your first question, the height of the new "mail" shape isn't 3 because the segment with line 3 isn't perpendicular to the other diagonal. Remember that the "height" of something always has to form a 90 degree angle with the base! This is basically the same ideas as why, if you have some triangle ABC, drawing any line from A to hit BC isn't necessarily the height of ABC. The height is only the line from A that is perpendicular to BC.

        I hope this helped! 🙂

        victorioussheepV 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 4
        • victorioussheepV
          victorioussheep M0★ M1★ M2★ M3★ M4 @audrey
          last edited by

          @audrey so......let me get this straighter...the x that you have used in that picture can be ANY number, right? so then does that mean that if x is 2, then the longest side of that triangle is 4? And the bottom side is 2sqrt(3)?

          audreyA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
          • victorioussheepV
            victorioussheep M0★ M1★ M2★ M3★ M4 @audrey
            last edited by

            @audrey Then would it possible if your picture looks somewhat like this: fa0c572b-df09-4393-830b-b9af9d034a6b-image.png would that be the same as the method?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
            • audreyA
              audrey MOD @victorioussheep
              last edited by

              @victorioussheep Yes, x just represents any number! So you're correct-- if x=2, then the hypotenuse has length 2 * 2 = 4, and the other leg has length 2*sqrt(3). 🙂

              For your second question, not exactly... the side length with length xsqrt(3) always must be adjacent to the 30 degree angle! That picture isn't exactly drawn to scale, but with any 30-60-90 triangle, one of the sides (the one with length xsqrt(3)) is always longer than the other. This diagram might help:
              triangle.png
              Basically, by dropping an altitude from an equilateral triangle, you can see that the shorter side (the one between 60 degrees and the right angle) always has length x. And then you can use the Pythagorean theorem to solve for the blue ?.

              Does that make more sense?

              victorioussheepV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • victorioussheepV
                victorioussheep M0★ M1★ M2★ M3★ M4 @audrey
                last edited by

                @audrey hmm......A little bit not understandable but also somehow makes sense...

                audreyA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                • audreyA
                  audrey MOD @victorioussheep
                  last edited by

                  @victorioussheep lol 😂 which part specifically doesn't make sense? I can try to explain it clearer.

                  victorioussheepV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                  • victorioussheepV
                    victorioussheep M0★ M1★ M2★ M3★ M4 @audrey
                    last edited by

                    @audrey Oh...what I meant is that I understand it in a weird way....but it makes sense and I get that explanation 😂 😂

                    audreyA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                    • audreyA
                      audrey MOD @victorioussheep
                      last edited by

                      @victorioussheep Oh okay, sounds good! 😄

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3

                      • 1 / 1
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      Daily Challenge | Terms | COPPA